Recommended Weekend Reads

February 23 - 25, 2024

Here are our recommended reads from reports and articles we read in the last week. We hope you find these useful and that you have a relaxing weekend.   And let us know if you or someone you know wants to be added to our distribution list.  Or sign-up for our Substack “Perspectives” to get our latest work:

China

• “Tracking China’s Control of Overseas Ports”  Council on Foreign Relations Interactive Report

  This interactive map tracks China’s growing maritime influence through investments in strategic overseas ports. Users can plot the location of each port and view satellite images alongside detailed information on the share of Chinese ownership, the total amount of Chinese investment, and the port’s suitability for use by the Chinese military. China operates or has ownership in at least one port in every continent except Antarctica. Of the 101 projects, 92 are active, whereas the remaining 9 port projects have become inactive due to cancellation or suspension by the end of September 2023. Reasons for cancellation or suspension include environmental concerns, souring of political relations, financial problems, and security issues raised domestically and internationally. Suspended projects, such as China’s construction of the Khalifa Port in the United Arab Emirates, could resume construction.

Latin America

• “Exporting Autocracy: China’s Role in Democratic Backsliding in Latin American and the Caribbean”  Center for Strategic and International Studies

  This report seeks to more fully enumerate the nature of China’s impact on democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). It posits two independent but correlated mechanisms through which China contributes to democratic backsliding. First, the PRC propagates its model of authoritarian governance through its soft power engagements in media, education, and people-to-people diplomacy, as well as through its security assistance, which often features tools enabling mass surveillance and the curtailment of civil and political rights. Second, China protects regimes undergoing democratic backsliding by providing economic and diplomatic cover even as these governments become increasingly isolated from the rest of the international system, in effect extending these governments beyond their natural lifespan. Having recognized the specific risk vectors China’s engagement poses in LAC, the report seeks to articulate the beginnings of a democracy-first grand strategy for the United States to pursue. Such a strategy should proceed along the lines of the “insulate, curtail, compete” framework outlined in a previous CSIS report. 
  

  “Challenges to Sheinbaum’s Fiscal Policy”   Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute

  Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo leads the race for the Mexican presidency, yet the complex political and fiscal legacy of her predecessor, Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), represents both an advantage and a burden to her campaign. While she aims for the continuity of her mentor’s key policies in education, energy, and economic development, Mexico’s current fiscal landscape leaves doubts on how her programs might be funded, requiring careful consideration and strategic policymaking.

Economics

• “Financial Markets’ Perceptions of the FOMC’s Data-Dependent Monetary Policy”  Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

  Abstract: Over the past ten years, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has repeatedly emphasized that future policy is data-dependent. In this Economic Commentary, we investigate how financial markets expected future interest rates to change with the release of new data on inflation and labor market conditions. We find that the surprises in economic indicators have a stronger effect on the 2-year Treasury yield than on the expected federal funds rate to be set in the next FOMC meeting. This implies that markets understand that under the data-dependent approach, policy decisions do not heavily rely on the most recent data or short-run fluctuations but, rather, rely more on the persistent trend of the economy. In addition, we observe that expected future interest rates have become more sensitive to surprises in inflation after 2022, suggesting that the FOMC’s determination to reduce inflation has been well-understood by the markets.
  

• “Trade War and Peace: U.S. – China Trade and Tariff Risk from 2015 – 2050”  National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper

  Abstract: We use the dynamics of U.S. imports across goods in the period around the U.S.-China trade war with a model of exporter dynamics to estimate the dynamic path of the probability of transiting between Normal Trade Relations and a trade war state. We find (i) there was no increase in the likelihood of a trade war before 2018; (ii) the trade war was initially expected to end quickly, but its expected duration grew substantially after 2020; and (iii) the trade war reduced the likelihood that China would face Non-Normal Trade Relations tariffs in the future. Our findings imply that the expected mean future U.S. tariff on China rose more under President Biden than under President Trump. We also show that the trade response to the trade war is similar to the response to the 1980 liberalization that initially granted China access to U.S. markets at NTR terms and was expected to be quickly reversed.

Energy Markets

• “Sanctions on Russia and the Splintering of the World Oil Market”  American Enterprise Institute

  After the West’s imposition of sanctions on Russia’s oil industry, there is a larger share of world oil production under sanction than at any time in decades. Sanctions impose costs on Iran, Russia, and Venezuela by forcing them to sell oil below market prices. However, sanctions also provide benefits to countries that buy cheap oil. China, India, and Turkey have been major beneficiaries of cheaper oil. Sanctions also make oil markets less efficient and more opaque. Policymakers must calibrate current and future oil sanctions to maximize cost imposition on adversaries while limiting the extent to which they make oil markets more inefficient.

European Security Policy

• “The future of European defense and security”   McKinsey & Company

  Much has been said and written about Europe’s urgent need to build up its defense capabilities.  But what does that exactly mean?  What precisely does the EU need to do and what challenges do EU governments, and the defense and security sectors face to achieve an effective level of defense?  McKinsey takes a deep dive to find those answers in this study.

Charts of the Week

How Russia Uses China to Get Around Sanctions

The Bell – a truly independent Russian economic news source – reports on how, since most leading economies placed tough sanctions on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, Russian companies (and the Kremlin) have worked tirelessly to get around the sanctions.  And they have found China to be the best place to get much of what they need for home consumption – as well as obtaining a lot of products known as “dual purpose” items – e.g., for civilian and military use.

Russian imports from China reached a record $111 billion in 2023, according to Chinese customs data analyzed by The Bell — up 47% on 2022, and 65% higher than in 2021, the last full year before the invasion. 

High-tech goods are among the top three Chinese exports to Russia. That’s no surprise: under sanctions, many Russian companies had to find new sources of equipment, spare parts, electronics and vehicles. In 2023, Russia significantly increased its imports of computers from China, as well as compressors, machine tools and their spare parts, turbines, optical devices and other advanced manufacturing equipment. The Bell lays it out in these excellent charts below: