Recommended Weekend Reads

August 16 - 18, 2024

Please find below our recommended reads from reports and articles we read in the last week.  We hope you find these useful and that you have a relaxing weekend.   And let us know if you or someone you know wants to be added to our distribution list.


Hacking, Deep Fakes, and the 2024 U.S. Elections

  • 100 Days Until Election 2024   U.S. Director of National Intelligence

    Already seeing the foreign governments attempting to meddle in the upcoming U.S. elections, The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) issued this unclassified memo explaining how the U.S. intelligence community is monitoring foreign actors trying to influence and disrupt the upcoming elections.  Well worth the read to understand the threat at hand.

  • How Foreign Governments Sway Voters with Online Manipulation   Scientific American

    2024 is the year of elections, with more than half the world’s population heading to the polls to vote. More than 100 countries including India, Taiwan, the UK, France, Russia, Venezuela, and soon, the United States, have held are holding national elections.  Most of the elections were free and fair, while others – such as Russia and Venezuela – were rigged, and opposition candidates either arrested or “disappeared.”  But one constant in most of these elections has emerged: Foreign government efforts to interfere and either discourage voters or mislead them with disinformation.  Scientific American Magazine did a deep dive into how malign foreign governments use social media and other mediums to achieve their goals.

  • Iran Steps into U.S. Election 2024 with Cyber-Enabled Influence Operations Campaign  Microsoft On the Issues

    Two weeks ago, news broke that the Trump campaign had been hacked, and the most likely culprit is Iran.  How is this happening?  In a new report from Microsoft details how foreign countries are seeking to negatively influence the 2024 US election.  As the report details, these malign forces started off slowly in 2024 but have steadily picked up the pace over the last six months. Russia was primarily the initial operator, but more recently, Iran has picked up the pace.  China is not far behind.

Source: Microsoft On the Issues

China

  • China’s Imaginary Trade Data   Brad Setser/Council on Foreign Relations “Follow the Money” Blog

    Council on Foreign Relations Senior Fellow Brad Setser took a deep dive into the IMF’s latest assessment of China.  In the appendix, he found something interesting: China has a new way of calculating its good trade balance - and that calculation is deeply misleading and helps to explain the apparent fall in the current account surplus.  For example, Setser believes the new method understates the current account surplus by $300 billion as of the second quarter of 2024 and that the actual surplus is closer to $700 billion.

  • China’s Great Wall of Villages   The New York Times

    President Xi calls them “border guardians.”  In this superb interactive report using satellite imagery, the New York Times reports on how the government built twelve new villages in frontier areas claimed by other countries in recent years, the New York Times reported based on satellite images. They are among more than fifty new villages in frontier areas, and while civilian in nature, they provide access points for China’s military. A spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington said regarding border issues, Beijing seeks “fair and reasonable solutions” through peaceful consultation.

Source: New York Times

  • Marijuana and Mexican cartels: Inside the stunning rise of Chinese money launderers  NBC News

    Over the past decade, Chinese organized crime groups in the U.S. quietly became the dominant money launderers for Mexican cartels. Then they used the profits to take over the illicit marijuana trade.  Experts worry that the organizations that now dominate money laundering worldwide pose a potential national security threat to the U.S.

Geoeconomics

  • Don’t Believe the AI Hype   Daron Acemoglu/Project Syndicate

    Acemoglu, an MIT Economics Professor, writes that if you listen to tech industry leaders, business-sector forecasters, and much of the media, you may believe that recent advances in generative AI will soon bring extraordinary productivity benefits, revolutionizing life as we know it. Yet neither economic theory nor the data support such exuberant forecasts.

  • Has the Recession Started?    Pascal Michaillat (UC Santa Cruz) and Emmanuel Saez (UC Berkeley)

    Abstract: To answer this question, we develop a new Sahm-type recession indicator that combines vacancy and unemployment data. The indicator is the minimum of the Sahm indicator -  the difference between the 3-month trailing average of the unemployment rate and its minimum over the past 12 months—and a similar indicator constructed with the vacancy rate—the difference between the 3-month trailing average of the vacancy rate and its maximum over the past 12 months. We then propose a two-sided recession rule: When our indicator reaches 0.3pp, a recession may have started; when the indicator reaches 0.8pp, a recession has started for sure. This new rule is triggered earlier than the Sahm rule: on average, it detects recessions 1.4 months after they have started, while the Sahm rule detects them 2.6 months after their start. The new rule also has a better historical track record: it perfectly identifies all recessions since 1930, while the Sahm rule breaks down before 1960. With July 2024 data, our indicator is at 0.5pp, so the probability that the US economy is now in recession is 40%. In fact, the recession may have started as early as March 2024.

Previous
Previous

U.S. Financial Regulatory Week Ahead

Next
Next

The Global Week Ahead