Recommended Weekend Reads

How is Geopolitics Impacting Corporate Investments, Canada’s and Mexico’s Retaliation Options, US Support for NATO Staying Strong, and is China Headed to a Prolonged Recession?

Geopolitical Risk, Economic Statecraft, and Tariff Impacts

• How Firms’ Perceptions of Geopolitical Risk Affect Investment  Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

  This brief introduces a new index that measures US firms' perceptions of geopolitical risk based on earnings call transcripts. On average, US firms perceive that geopolitical risk has risen sharply in recent years. Perceptions that geopolitical risk is elevated can result in significant and persistent reductions in future investment, particularly for firms in industries that view geopolitical risk as especially high. Firms with low cash positions reduce future investment more than those with higher liquidity when they perceive that geopolitical risk is elevated.

• Economic Statecraft: The Need for an Integrated Approach  H.R. McMaster & Andrew Grotto/Hoover Institution

  The competition between democracies and authoritarian regimes will shape the future of global power. China and Russia, alongside North Korea and Iran, aim to weaken US influence. To prevail, the United States must integrate economic power into its strategy, counter unfair trade practices, and support key industries. This report urges President Trump to issue an executive order for a coordinated economic statecraft strategy and improved analytic capabilities to enhance decision making.

• A World Safe for Prosperity: How American Can Foster Economic Security Geoffrey Gertz & Emily Kilcrease/Foreign Affairs

  U.S. President Donald Trump jolted the global economy this past weekend when he announced sweeping tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico, the United States’ three largest trading partners. Trump’s actions confirmed what his campaign rhetoric had led observers to believe: that tariffs, whether implemented or threatened, will be central to his foreign policy. Many of the United States’ closest trading partners also prioritize economic security. But today’s trade and investment agreements tend to relegate it to the periphery rather than treat it as central to economic relationships. This must change. Building on their existing commitments, the United States and its close partners should pursue a series of binding bilateral or regional economic security agreements that will nurture greater economic cooperation, as well as more effective coordination against outside rivals, particularly China.

• Canada and Mexico have retaliation options that shrink American take-home pay  Simon Evenett & Marc-Andreas Muendler/UC San Diego Globalization and Prosperity Lab

  Abstract: Trade conflict is costly to all parties. Canadian and Mexican trade retaliation can deny tariff-related wins for American workers. Blunt retaliation could go so far as to eliminate all the take-home pay gains in 40 U.S. states and make whatever gains occur elsewhere barely noticeable. Tariff-induced higher prices are a further drag on American families. Canada and Mexico would take a strong hit from blunt retaliation, but they can use smarter approaches and demonstrate the limits of America First Trade Policy for U.S. workers.

• Carrots, Sticks, and Sledgehammers: Trump’s Options for Reducing U.S. Oil Prices  Center for Strategic and International Studies

  Since his second term began on January 20, 2025, President Trump has clearly signaled a desire for lower oil prices. Executive orders, including “Unleashing American Energy,” as well as his remarks to the Davos World Economic Forum audience on January 23, outline Trump’s case for bringing down the price of oil. Apart from the obvious direct advantage of reducing costs for consumers and businesses, Trump has associated the benefits of lower energy prices with two strategic priorities: first, as an instrument for taming inflation. Trump believes that a lower energy price environment will pave the way for the Federal Reserve to reduce interest rates and stimulate economic activity. Second, Trump has asserted that lower oil prices will hasten an end to the war in Ukraine, ostensibly because Moscow would be deprived of oil export revenues sufficient to sustain its war effort. This reason, however, may have been superseded by recent events, including a February 12 phone call between Trump and Putin, a bilateral meeting of advisors in Riyadh on February 18, and Trump’s February 24 prediction that the war could end within a few weeks.

• Americans' Foreign Policy Priorities, NATO Support Unchanged  Gallup

  Americans’ U.S. foreign policy preferences at the start of Donald Trump's second term are largely the same as Gallup found when he took office in 2017. The public is united in thinking the nation's top priorities should be preventing terrorism, curtailing nuclear proliferation and securing energy supplies. Smaller majorities want the U.S. to pursue favorable trade deals and work with organizations like the United Nations to bring about global cooperation. Relatively few, on the other hand, rate promoting democracy or economic development in other countries as highly important, although there are sharp partisan differences in views on this group of goals. These findings are from Gallup’s annual World Affairs poll, conducted Feb. 3-16. In addition to measuring Americans’ preferred foreign policy goals for the first time in eight years, the poll finds widespread public support for the NATO alliance, unchanged from the prior reading in 2019.

Asian Trade & Economics

• Facilitating Confidence-Driven Trade in South Asia  Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  Greater economic stability in South Asia hinges on the continued need for confidence-building measures (CBMs), which can help foster trust and create an environment conducive to long-term cooperation and growth. Positive examples of such efforts can be seen within the region. More than five decades after the 1971 war that led to the creation of an independent Bangladesh, the recent inauguration of a direct sea trade link between Karachi in Pakistan and Chittagong in Bangladesh marks a hopeful shift in South Asian diplomacy, demonstrating the potential for CBMs and international cooperation even after decades of discord.

• China is on course for a prolonged recession  The Strategist/Australian Strategic Policy Institute

  The risk of China spiraling into an unprecedentedly prolonged recession is increasing. Its economy is experiencing deflation, with the price level falling for a second consecutive year in 2024, according to recent data from the National Bureau of Statistics of China. It’s on track for the longest period of economy-wide price declines since the 1960s. Coupled with the collapse of the property sector, a looming trade war with the United States and demographic and debt overhang challenges, much of the Chinese public has lost confidence in the economy and its leadership. The country has the ingredients for a recession, and not a short one. It has spent too much on investment and needs to turn to consumption as a source of demand, but people are unwilling to spend. They have long had high savings rates, and now deflation is further discouraging spending. So do falling property values, ageing of the population and excessive corporate and government debt.